Games Workshop reveals a brand-new Warhammer 40K model for a beloved fan-favorite character. See the details and artwork here!
It wouldn’t be a Warhammer 40K reveal weekend without some Space Marines making an appearance—and make an appearance they did.
During a reveal show packed with incredible models that were widely praised, it’s clear that Space Marine fans—especially those who love the Ultramarines—remain the favorites of Games Workshop.
Titus Gets an Upgrade in Warhammer 40K
Surprising some fans, we are officially getting a new model for Titus. This time, he’s been promoted and takes command of the 2nd Company as Captain—again.
If you haven’t seen the new reveal yet, check out the full Warhammer Community article here.
For what it’s worth, this model is outstanding. It’s, without a doubt, the best Titus model ever released and a spectacular addition to an already impressive Ultramarines range.
Titus Isn’t Alone
Titus won’t be standing alone on the battlefield. While details are still scarce, it looks like he will be part of a new Command Squad-style unit, joined by Gadriel, Metaurus, and some human auxiliary components.
Sharp-eyed fans will notice that Chairon is missing—perhaps he will be revealed next—but his absence is certainly curious.
What We Know and What’s Next
There are still plenty of questions about this new release, including how the units will function together and what their rules will look like. We’re likely still months away from seeing them on the tabletop.
Fans can hope for some early rules teasers soon, which may reveal if Titus will become another must-take named character for every Ultramarines list. After all, it wouldn’t be the first time.
Husband, Florida State Seminole, and fan of all things grimdark, sometimes even winning a game or two.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This means if you click a link and buy something, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I only recommend products I use and trust for the Warhammer 40K hobby.
One Reply to “”